Sacrificing the Xbox? Microsoft’s High-Stakes Halo Bet on the Nintendo Switch 2

by EzraJvBQin Business developmenton Posted on

I. Introduction

The video game industry is in a perpetual state of evolution, with platform holders constantly reassessing strategies to maximize profitability and reach in a dynamic market. A pivotal question has emerged regarding Microsoft’s long-term business strategy: is it a sound decision to license flagship franchises, notably Halo, to competing platforms like Nintendo’s upcoming Switch 2? This report delves into the multifaceted implications of such a move, examining Microsoft’s shifting gaming philosophy, the current state of the Halo IP, the capabilities of the Nintendo Switch 2, and the potential market responses. The analysis aims to determine whether this represents a prudent long-term business decision for Microsoft, considering revenue generation, brand impact, ecosystem integrity, and the broader industry trajectory.

II. Microsoft’s Evolving Gaming Strategy: Software and Services Ascendant

Microsoft’s approach to its Xbox division has undergone a significant transformation, moving away from a primary focus on console hardware sales towards a model prioritizing software and services. This strategic pivot is underscored by financial performance and explicit statements from company leadership.

A. The Shift from Hardware to Content and Services

Historically, console manufacturers relied on exclusive titles to drive hardware sales. However, Microsoft’s recent trajectory indicates a de-emphasis on this traditional model. CEO Satya Nadella has articulated a focus on “long-term gaming profitability through high-margin content and services,” signaling that digital distribution and subscription models like Xbox Game Pass are viewed as more lucrative than hardware units.1 This sentiment is echoed by Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer, who has emphasized a mission to “meet players wherever they are,” rather than being confined by a console war mentality.1

This strategic shift is further evidenced by Microsoft’s actions, such as releasing Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 simultaneously on Xbox and PlayStation in late 2024, a move that generated substantial revenue from other platforms.1 Indeed, Microsoft’s multi-platform approach is not a recent development spurred solely by major acquisitions; rather, it is an adaptation to evolving market conditions where console market share has been challenging to wrestle from competitors, and the costs associated with game development continue to escalate.2 The acquisitions, particularly that of Activision Blizzard King, have provided Microsoft with a vast content arsenal to execute this software-centric strategy at an unprecedented scale, transforming the company into a formidable multi-platform publisher.2

B. Financial Drivers: The Tale of the Numbers

Recent financial reports paint a clear picture of this strategic reorientation. In Microsoft’s December 2024 financial report (Q2 FY25), overall gaming revenue reached $6.58 billion, a decrease of 7% year-on-year. This decline was primarily attributed to a significant 29% drop in Xbox hardware sales.1 Conversely, Xbox content and services revenue demonstrated growth, up 2% year-over-year in the same period, propelled by the expansion of Xbox Game Pass and strong performance from Activision Blizzard content.3 This pattern highlights the increasing importance of software and services as the primary revenue engines for Microsoft’s gaming division. The company’s ascent to become the “largest video game publisher on PC and consoles globally” in December 2024, with approximately $465 million spent on its games across Xbox, PlayStation, and Steam in that month alone, is telling. Notably, 64% of that spending originated from PlayStation players, underscoring the immense revenue potential outside its own hardware ecosystem.1

Table 1: Microsoft Gaming Division Financial Snapshot (FY24 Q4 – FY25 Q2)

MetricPeriodValue/GrowthSource(s)
Total Gaming RevenueQ2 FY25 (YoY)$6.58 billion (-7%)1
Xbox Content & Services RevenueQ2 FY25 (YoY)+2%3
Xbox Hardware RevenueQ2 FY25 (YoY)-29%1
Game Pass SubscribersEarly 202225 million (official)1
Game Pass Subscribers2024 (est.)Exceeded 30 million1
Game Pass PC Subscriber GrowthQ2 FY25+30% (quarterly revenue record for Game Pass)4
Global Publisher Rank (by revenue)Dec 2024#11
% of Microsoft Game Spending from PlayStation UsersDec 202464%1

This financial data provides a compelling rationale for Microsoft’s strategic direction. The diminishing returns from hardware sales, contrasted with the robust growth in content and services, naturally steer the company towards maximizing software sales across all available platforms.

C. Xbox Game Pass: The Ecosystem’s Centerpiece

Xbox Game Pass remains a strategic core for Microsoft’s gaming ambitions. The service, which offers access to a vast library of games, including all first-party titles on day one, for a monthly fee, is a key differentiator.1 Microsoft reportedly invests around $1 billion annually to bring third-party games to Game Pass.1 While official subscriber numbers were last reported at 25 million in early 2022, trusted reports suggest this figure surpassed 30 million in 2024, with significant growth on PC.1 In Q2 FY25, Game Pass set a new quarterly revenue record, with a 30% growth in PC subscribers.4 Microsoft often positions Game Pass as the best place to play its first-party titles, potentially offering in-game perks or simply the value of immediate access via subscription.2

D. The “Play Anywhere” Vision and Its Current Traction

Integral to Microsoft’s ecosystem strategy is the “Play Anywhere” initiative. This feature allows users who purchase a supporting digital title to play it on both their Xbox console and Windows PC, with game progress, achievements, and add-ons seamlessly synchronized across platforms.5 Microsoft has promoted this as a way to offer players flexibility and increase engagement, noting that games supporting Play Anywhere see over 20% more hours played per user.7

Despite the compelling vision of “Play Anywhere,” its adoption by third-party developers has been notably limited. An analysis revealed that only 7% of games launched in 2024 supported the feature, representing a decline from the previous year. The percentage of games supporting Play Anywhere has remained relatively flat over the past five years.8 While Microsoft’s own first-party titles generally support the feature, this is not universal; for example, the Diablo IV expansion reportedly required separate purchases for PC and Xbox versions, despite having cross-save support.8 This low uptake by third parties presents a challenge. If a key feature designed to enhance the Xbox/PC ecosystem’s unique value isn’t gaining widespread traction, it may implicitly encourage Microsoft to pursue direct multi-platform releases for its own major titles. This approach would ensure maximum reach, rather than relying on players gravitating to the Xbox/PC ecosystem primarily for the Play Anywhere benefit on those specific titles. The limited success of Play Anywhere in becoming a widely adopted standard could, therefore, paradoxically accelerate Microsoft’s own first-party games appearing on competing consoles as the company seeks guaranteed audience engagement through direct presence.

III. Halo: A Legacy IP at a Strategic Crossroads

The Halo franchise is not merely another intellectual property for Microsoft; it is a foundational element of the Xbox brand’s history and identity. Any decision regarding its platform availability carries significant weight.

A. Historical Importance: The Pillar of Xbox

Halo: Combat Evolved, launched in 2001, was instrumental in validating the original Xbox console. It significantly contributed to the popularization of the first-person shooter (FPS) genre on consoles and appealed to a broader audience, selling over six million copies in its first decade.9 The franchise as a whole had sold more than 65 million units by 2015 and was widely regarded as Microsoft’s flagship video game series.9 Halo 2 further revolutionized console multiplayer gaming in 2004, particularly with its integration of Xbox Live.9 The launch of Halo 3 in 2007 was a cultural phenomenon, with Microsoft declaring its release the biggest day in entertainment history at the time, generating $170 million in US sales on its first day.10 This legacy establishes Halo as a brand far exceeding a simple game series; it was, for many years, synonymous with the Xbox experience.

B. Current State and Challenges: An Identity in Flux

Despite its storied past, the Halo franchise is currently navigating what has been described as an “identity crisis”.10 While Halo 4 (2012) was praised for its emotional storytelling, particularly the relationship between Master Chief and Cortana 10, subsequent entries have faced challenges. Halo 5: Guardians (2015) launched without several features many fans had come to expect.10 More recently, Halo Infinite (2021), despite a promising start and a move to free-to-play multiplayer, struggled to retain players in the long term and was not the definitive return to form many had hoped for.10 The Halo television series, which aired in 2022 and 2024, also received mixed reactions and arguably did little to bolster the brand’s prestige.10 Consequently, Halo Studios (formerly 343 Industries) faces the task of regaining fan trust and making the franchise appealing to a younger generation of players more accustomed to titles like Fortnite, Apex Legends, and Valorant, all while staying true to Halo’s core identity.10

The “fumbling” of the Halo IP in recent years has arguably diminished its power as an Xbox exclusive system-seller.10 This decline makes the decision to go multi-platform less about abandoning a crown jewel at its zenith and more about a strategic maneuver to find new avenues to restore its prominence and commercial viability. Its value proposition may be shifting from primarily driving hardware sales to becoming a more significant software revenue generator across multiple platforms.

C. Strategic Implications of Halo Going Multi-Platform

The prospect of Halo appearing on competing platforms, such as the Nintendo Switch 2 and PlayStation 5 12, aligns with Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer’s assertion that there are “no red lines” within Microsoft’s first-party lineup when considering multi-platform releases, explicitly including Halo.13 This strategy is framed as a business decision aimed at making Microsoft’s games “as strong as possible” and growing the overall gaming business, particularly following the substantial investment in acquiring Activision Blizzard.13

Releasing Halo more broadly could “breathe new life” into the franchise and generate funds for long-requested updates and content.10 Former Xbox executive Peter Moore highlighted the immense revenue potential, speculating that Halo as a third-party title “could do a billion” dollars, a figure that would compel serious consideration.13 This connects the franchise’s current somewhat diminished state to a clear strategic rationale for seeking wider availability and new audiences.

If Halo, arguably the Xbox’s most iconic and historically defining IP, becomes widely available on competing consoles, it would send the clearest signal to date that no Microsoft IP is inextricably bound to Xbox hardware. Such a move could fundamentally alter both developer and consumer perceptions of what constitutes an “Xbox game,” thereby accelerating the brand’s transformation into a publisher and service provider first, with console manufacturing playing a secondary, albeit still present, role. This would represent a significant milestone in Microsoft’s evolving identity within the gaming landscape.

IV. Nintendo Switch 2: A New Frontier for Third-Party Content?

Nintendo’s successor to the highly successful Switch is poised to enter the market, bringing with it upgraded capabilities that could significantly alter its appeal to third-party developers, including those publishing large-scale, graphically demanding titles.

A. Overview of Switch 2’s Capabilities and Market Positioning

The Nintendo Switch 2, anticipated for release in 2025 16, is expected to maintain the hybrid design philosophy of its predecessor but with notable enhancements. It is reported to feature a larger 7.9-inch LCD screen with a 1920×1080 resolution, HDR10 support, and Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) up to 120 Hz in handheld mode.17 The console will introduce redesigned Joy-Con 2 controllers that attach magnetically and feature improved analog sticks (though reportedly not Hall effect sensors) and “HD Rumble 2”.16 A built-in microphone will support a new “GameChat” feature for voice and video communication with friends.16

Crucially, the Switch 2 is set for a significant performance uplift. It will be powered by a new custom NVIDIA system-on-chip (SoC) featuring an Ampere architecture GPU and eight ARM Cortex A78C CPU cores.16 This will be complemented by 12GB of LPDDRX RAM and 256GB of internal UFS storage (up from the Switch OLED’s 64GB), with support for faster microSD Express cards for expansion.16 Networking capabilities will also be improved with Wi-Fi 6 support, and the new dock will include an Ethernet port for wired connectivity.16 This enhanced power is vital for running more demanding multi-platform games that had to bypass the original, underpowered Switch, potentially including titles like Halo with appropriate optimizations such as NVIDIA DLSS.16 Nintendo is forecasting strong demand, with plans to sell 15 million Switch 2 units globally during its fiscal year 2026 (ending March 31), indicating confidence in establishing a substantial install base attractive to third-party publishers.21

B. Nintendo’s Strategy for Attracting Third-Party Publishers

Nintendo has expressed a goal of curating the “broadest and deepest library of content we possibly can” for the Switch 2, explicitly including publishing partners.22 A key component of this strategy is the introduction of “Game-Key Cards.” These physical cards, distinct from traditional game cartridges, will often contain only a key to download the chosen game rather than the full game data itself.22 Nintendo presents this as a mechanism to enable publishing partners to bring “deeper and larger, more immersive content onto the platform”.22

The rationale behind Game-Key Cards is largely economic. Manufacturing high-capacity game cartridges is significantly more expensive than producing Blu-ray discs, and these costs escalate with storage size.22 For publishers of large AAA titles, which can exceed 50GB or even 100GB, this cost can be a prohibitive factor. The Switch 2 reportedly supports physical cartridges up to 64GB, but for games exceeding this, or for publishers seeking better margins, Game-Key Cards offer a solution by shifting the data delivery to digital download, thereby reducing manufacturing expenses.22 Despite being download-centric, these Game-Key Cards can still be resold and borrowed, maintaining a semblance of physical ownership that many consumers value.24

The combination of the Switch 2’s significantly improved hardware capabilities and Nintendo’s Game-Key Card strategy creates a more technically feasible and financially attractive environment for large-scale third-party games. This synergy directly addresses historical limitations—namely, underpowered hardware and the high cost and capacity constraints of cartridges—that often resulted in Nintendo consoles receiving fewer, or significantly compromised, versions of AAA multi-platform titles.16 This could pave the way for unprecedented third-party support if the Switch 2 achieves a substantial install base, making it a more viable platform for franchises like Halo that might have been impractical on previous Nintendo systems.

However, it is important to note Nintendo’s historical context with third-party developers, which has seen periods of strong support alternate with times when developers were deterred by platform limitations or perceived market viability, even when console sales were high.25 While the Switch 2 appears better equipped to address these concerns, sustained third-party commitment will depend on its market performance and the ease of development.

If the Switch 2 successfully attracts a significant volume of AAA third-party titles, including major franchises from publishers like Microsoft, it could begin to blur the traditional lines between Nintendo’s often family-centric image and the “core gamer” market typically associated with PlayStation and Xbox. This would undoubtedly expand Nintendo’s demographic reach but would also place it in more direct competition with Sony and Microsoft for software sales on its own platform, a new dynamic for the company.

Table 2: Comparative Overview: Nintendo Switch 2, Xbox Series S/X, PlayStation 5

FeatureNintendo Switch 2Xbox Series SXbox Series XPlayStation 5 (Standard)
CPU/GPU General TierCustom NVIDIA (Ampere GPU, 8 ARM A78C CPU cores) 16Custom AMD Zen 2 CPU, RDNA 2 GPUCustom AMD Zen 2 CPU, RDNA 2 GPUCustom AMD Zen 2 CPU, RDNA 2 GPU
RAM12GB LPDDRX 1610GB GDDR616GB GDDR616GB GDDR6
Internal Storage256GB UFS 16512GB Custom NVMe SSD1TB Custom NVMe SSD825GB Custom NVMe SSD
Expandable Storage TypemicroSD Express (up to 2TB) 17Proprietary Expansion Card, USB HDDProprietary Expansion Card, USB HDDNVMe SSD Slot, USB HDD
Max Handheld Resolution1920×1080 (1080p) 17N/AN/AN/A (Remote Play dependent)
Handheld Refresh RateUp to 120Hz (VRR) 17N/AN/AN/A (Remote Play dependent)
Max Docked Resolution3840×2160 (4K) @ 60fps / 2560×1440 (1440p) @ 120fps 18Up to 1440pUp to 4K (8K support)Up to 4K (8K support)
Docked Refresh RateUp to 120Hz (VRR) 18Up to 120HzUp to 120HzUp to 120Hz
Key TechnologiesNVIDIA DLSS (reported), HDR10, GameChat, Magnetic Joy-Con 2 16Quick Resume, Ray Tracing, Variable Rate ShadingQuick Resume, Ray Tracing, Variable Rate ShadingTempest 3D AudioTech, Ray Tracing, DualSense Haptics

Note: Xbox Series S/X and PlayStation 5 specifications are based on publicly available information.

This table provides a technical baseline for understanding the Switch 2’s capabilities relative to current-generation home consoles. While not matching the raw power of the Series X or PS5, the Switch 2 represents a substantial leap over its predecessor and incorporates modern technologies that will aid in delivering compelling versions of demanding games.

V. The Business Case: Licensing Halo to Nintendo Switch 2

Evaluating the decision to license a flagship IP like Halo to a competitor’s platform requires a careful weighing of potential benefits against inherent risks. For Microsoft, this move is deeply intertwined with its broader strategic shift towards software and service dominance.

A. Potential Upsides for Microsoft

  1. New Revenue Streams and Market Expansion:
    The most immediate and compelling upside is the potential for significant new revenue. The Nintendo Switch achieved an install base of over 150 million units 27, and Nintendo forecasts selling 15 million Switch 2 units in its first fiscal year alone.21 Tapping into this massive and often distinct player base offers a substantial opportunity for software sales. Microsoft’s experience in December 2024, where it became the top global game publisher with 64% of its game spending coming from PlayStation users, vividly illustrates the revenue potential on external platforms.1 Licensing Halo, a globally recognized franchise, to the Switch 2 could amplify these software revenues considerably. Former Xbox executive Peter Moore even speculated that Halo could generate “a billion” dollars if treated as a third-party IP.13 Furthermore, Microsoft has recently increased the price of its new, first-party Xbox games to $79.99, aligning with the premium pricing tier also adopted by Nintendo for some Switch 2 titles, suggesting an expectation of strong sales at these higher price points.28
  2. Broadening Halo’s IP Reach and Player Base:
    Beyond immediate financial gains, bringing Halo to the Switch 2 would introduce the franchise to a new generation and demographic of players who may not own an Xbox console or a gaming PC.2 This aligns perfectly with Microsoft’s stated goal to “meet players wherever they are” and to make its games “as strong as possible” by reaching the largest possible audience.1 For a franchise like Halo, which has faced an “identity crisis” and challenges in retaining its past widespread appeal 10, accessing Nintendo’s user base could be a vital step in reinvigorating the IP and ensuring its long-term cultural relevance and commercial viability. The Switch’s historically younger demographic could also open new avenues for specific Halo experiences or merchandise.29
  3. Strengthening Microsoft’s Position as a Multi-Platform Publisher:
    Successfully launching Halo on the Switch 2 would be a definitive statement of Microsoft’s commitment to its multi-platform strategy. It would solidify its status as a dominant software provider across all major gaming ecosystems, a position significantly bolstered by its acquisitions of ZeniMax Media and Activision Blizzard King.1 This move would demonstrate that Microsoft is leveraging its vast IP portfolio to maximize its presence and influence throughout the global gaming market, irrespective of hardware allegiances.

B. Potential Risks and Downsides for Microsoft

  1. Devaluation of the Xbox Console and Brand Identity:
    The most significant risk is the potential erosion of the Xbox console’s unique selling proposition. If flagship exclusives, particularly a system-defining franchise like Halo, are readily available on competing platforms, the primary incentive for many consumers to purchase Xbox hardware diminishes.19 This could lead to a perception of the Xbox brand shifting primarily to that of a service and publisher, with its hardware identity becoming less distinct and essential.4 Some third-party developers have reportedly expressed confusion, questioning the rationale for developing Xbox-specific versions of their games if Microsoft itself is releasing its biggest titles elsewhere, potentially leading them to deprioritize the Xbox platform.31 The Xbox brand, once synonymous with a specific console experience, is already “no longer associated with a single device” for many, a trend this move would accelerate.4
  2. Cannibalization of Xbox Hardware Sales:
    Directly linked to brand devaluation is the risk of cannibalizing Xbox hardware sales. Consumers who might have previously purchased an Xbox console specifically for access to Halo may opt for a Nintendo Switch 2 (or a PlayStation 5, if Halo also launches there) if the game is available on those platforms.3 This could further impact Xbox hardware sales, which have already shown a declining trend.1 Microsoft’s own marketing campaigns around its “Play Anywhere” initiative have even been interpreted by some as encouraging users to skip Xbox consoles in favor of playing Xbox games on other devices like PCs and handhelds.8
  3. Impact on Game Pass Subscriptions and Ecosystem Lock-in:
    Xbox Game Pass is a cornerstone of Microsoft’s gaming strategy, with its value proposition heavily reliant on offering first-party titles, like Halo, on day one at no additional cost beyond the subscription fee.1 If these flagship titles are sold as premium standalone purchases on competing platforms like the Switch 2, it could potentially reduce the incentive for some users to subscribe to Game Pass, particularly those who primarily game on Nintendo or PlayStation hardware. Why subscribe to a service for Halo if one can simply buy it directly on their preferred platform?
    However, this risk is nuanced. The high price of standalone games (e.g., $80 on Switch 2) could conversely make Game Pass appear as an even more incredible value proposition.34 There have been discussions and rumors about Game Pass itself potentially coming to Switch 2, but this is complex; Nintendo would likely demand a significant revenue share or impose restrictions that could dilute the service’s appeal or Microsoft’s earnings from it.35 If Game Pass does not launch on Switch 2, or if it does so in a compromised form, then selling Halo as a standalone title directly competes with the core value offered by Game Pass on Microsoft’s own platforms.

Microsoft is navigating a fundamental tension between maximizing immediate software revenue through individual game sales on all platforms and preserving the long-term value and growth of its Game Pass subscription service. Each standalone sale of Halo on a Switch 2 is a direct revenue win but could represent a missed opportunity to convert that user into the recurring revenue stream of a Game Pass subscriber. This balance is crucial, especially if Game Pass cannot be seamlessly or profitably integrated onto competing platforms like the Switch 2.35

Furthermore, the “devaluation of the Xbox console” extends beyond just hardware unit sales; it can diminish Microsoft’s negotiating power with third-party developers. If the Xbox hardware platform is perceived as having a shrinking or less distinct user base because its premier titles are available everywhere, third-party developers might allocate fewer resources to Xbox-specific optimizations or even bypass Xbox versions of their games entirely.31 This could create a negative feedback loop, further weakening the Xbox platform’s health and attractiveness, even if Microsoft thrives as a multi-platform publisher.

Table 3: Strategic Analysis: Microsoft Licensing Halo to Nintendo Switch 2

Potential Benefits for MicrosoftPotential Risks for Microsoft
Significant new software revenue streams from Switch 2’s large install base 1Reduced incentive to purchase Xbox hardware, potentially accelerating hardware sales decline 3
Massive expansion of Halo IP reach to new demographics and Nintendo’s player base 2Dilution of Xbox brand identity; console becomes less distinct from competitors 4
Potential to reinvigorate the Halo franchise and restore its mainstream appeal 10Possible negative impact on Game Pass value proposition if flagship titles are widely sold standalone 34
Reinforces Microsoft’s dominance and identity as a leading multi-platform publisher 1Alienation of core Xbox loyalists who value platform exclusivity 11
Aligns with the strategic imperative to “meet players wherever they are” 1Third-party developers may deprioritize Xbox platform support if Microsoft’s own commitment appears diluted 31

VI. Market Response: Gauging the Ripple Effects

The decision to license a franchise as iconic as Halo to a direct competitor like Nintendo would inevitably send ripples throughout the gaming market, eliciting varied responses from consumers, competitors, and investors.

A. Consumer Sentiment

  1. Reactions from Xbox Loyalists:
    A segment of the hardcore Xbox fanbase is likely to react negatively, viewing such a move as a devaluation of their investment in the Xbox ecosystem and a betrayal of the principle of console exclusivity.13 For these dedicated players, exclusives are a primary reason for choosing a particular platform. The availability of Halo on Switch 2 could be perceived as Microsoft abandoning its base or rendering the Xbox console itself redundant [30 (“inevitable discontinuation of the console platform”), 13 (“disgruntled after what they feel is a devaluing of the Xbox”)]. There is a palpable concern among some that this strategy signals the end of Xbox as a distinct hardware contender.
    However, opinions may be divided. Some Xbox users who also own other platforms or who prioritize accessibility might welcome the move, seeing it as a pragmatic business decision or simply appreciating the ability to play their favorite games on more devices [30 (“My opinion has changed on the multiplatform approach”)]. The sentiment that “Halo IS Xbox” is strong for many, making its appearance elsewhere feel particularly jarring or “WILD!”.11
  2. Perspectives of Nintendo Fans and Multi-Platform Gamers:
    Nintendo fans are generally expected to react with excitement at the prospect of playing major third-party franchises like Halo on a Nintendo console, especially one with the enhanced capabilities of the Switch 2 [11 (“it would be great to be able to enjoy Elder Scrolls on the Switch”)]. The desire for more mature, large-scale games on Nintendo platforms is palpable among a segment of its audience. Multi-platform gamers, by definition, value choice and accessibility, and would likely view Halo on Switch 2 as a positive development, increasing their options for how and where to play [33 (“a multi-platform future is the perfect way”)].
    While some Nintendo enthusiasts have expressed a slight disappointment that the Switch 2, based on leaks, appears to be a more powerful iteration of the original rather than a radically innovative Nintendo-esque concept, the ability to play a wider array of more demanding games is a significant draw.36 The potential for a robust third-party library, including titles from Microsoft, contributes to the anticipation for the new console.

B. Competitor Landscape

  1. Likely Strategic Responses from Sony PlayStation:
    Sony has also been cautiously expanding its platform reach by releasing some former PlayStation exclusives on PC, typically after a period of console exclusivity.39 However, it has been more reserved about bringing its core first-party titles to direct console competitors. Microsoft’s aggressive multi-platform strategy, particularly with a franchise like Halo, might compel Sony to further scrutinize its own exclusivity model.
    One possible response is for Sony to double down on its own first-party exclusives as the primary differentiators for the PlayStation 5, emphasizing the unique, high-quality experiences only available on its hardware.27 Alternatively, if Microsoft’s strategy proves highly lucrative without fatally damaging its core business, Sony might feel pressured to explore similar avenues, though likely with continued caution. Some analysts suggest Sony might be more open to releasing games on Nintendo platforms, which it may perceive as less of a direct competitor in the high-end console space than Xbox.30
    A more assertive stance could see Sony leveraging any perceived weakening of the Xbox hardware brand to attract disenfranchised Xbox players to the PlayStation ecosystem [30 (“Keeping their exclusives off XBox increases the chance of XBox dying out as a competitor platform which strengthens Sony’s position”)]. Given that many of Microsoft’s major upcoming titles, including those from newly acquired studios like Bethesda and Activision, are already slated for PlayStation 5 release 4, Sony is already benefiting from Microsoft’s multi-platform approach in terms of content availability.
  2. Implications for the Broader Console Market Dynamics:
    Microsoft’s potential licensing of Halo to Switch 2 could accelerate the ongoing shift in the console market away from traditional hardware-centric competition towards a model more focused on software and services. If major exclusives become widely available across platforms, the differentiating factors for consoles may increasingly rely on the strength of their subscription services (like Game Pass versus PlayStation Plus), cloud gaming capabilities, unique hardware features (like the Switch’s portability), and overall ecosystem benefits, rather than a small library of exclusive games. This could lead to a more fluid market where consumers choose platforms based on a broader value proposition. The rising cost of game development and retail prices for new games 28 also puts pressure on the traditional model, potentially making multi-platform releases more economically necessary for publishers to recoup investments.

C. Investor and Analyst Outlook

  1. Impact on Microsoft (MSFT) and Nintendo (NTDOY) Stock:
    Financial analysts have generally viewed Microsoft’s broader multi-platform strategy positively for MSFT stock. The rationale is that increased software sales across all platforms, including competitors’, can lead to significant revenue growth and margin expansion, outweighing potential declines in hardware profitability.13 The focus shifts to Microsoft as a service and content provider, a model often favored by investors for its recurring revenue potential and scalability.
    For Nintendo (NTDOY), stock performance has been buoyed by anticipation for the Switch 2 and the potential for strong hardware and software sales.45 The availability of major third-party franchises like Halo on the Switch 2 would likely be seen as a positive development by investors, as it could enhance the console’s appeal, drive hardware adoption, and increase software sales on the platform. Analysts anticipate strong initial sales for the Switch 2, driven by its first-party lineup and pent-up consumer demand, a scenario that would be further supported by robust third-party commitment.47 Reports of Halo: The Master Chief Collection coming to Switch 2 are framed as an expansion of Microsoft’s successful multiplatform strategy.15
  2. Overall Industry Analyst Perspectives:
    While acknowledging the risks associated with devaluing the Xbox hardware brand 2, many industry analysts perceive Microsoft’s move towards multi-platform releases as a necessary and logical evolution. This strategy allows Microsoft to leverage its vast IP portfolio to achieve greater profitability and market reach in the long term, especially given its current market position relative to Sony in console sales.2 The prevailing view is that Microsoft is transforming into a “service platform,” where the primary goal is to get its content and services, particularly Game Pass, in front of as many players as possible, regardless of the device they use.44 There’s also a recognition that the segment of “hardcore” console loyalists who demand strict exclusivity is influential but ultimately a shrinking portion of the overall gaming market.13

If Microsoft successfully licenses Halo to the Switch 2 and demonstrates significant financial success without a catastrophic collapse of its core Xbox ecosystem (for instance, if Game Pass subscriptions continue to grow and cloud gaming initiatives expand), it could further normalize the concept of major first-party IPs appearing on competing console hardware. Over time, this might reduce the “outrage” factor among platform loyalists and exert pressure on other platform holders, like Sony, to adopt more open strategies, leading to a more fluid and accessible software market.

The current consumer discourse around rising game prices, with new titles often costing $70 or $80 (a price point some Switch 2 games are expected to adopt 28), could inadvertently bolster the appeal of subscription services like Xbox Game Pass. Even if individual Microsoft first-party titles are sold at a premium on other platforms, Microsoft can strategically position Game Pass as the most cost-effective way to access its extensive library. This makes the service itself, rather than a specific Xbox console, the central “platform” in Microsoft’s gaming strategy. The high standalone price of Halo on Switch 2 could, therefore, be used as a marketing tool to highlight the superior value proposition of Game Pass for accessing not just Halo but a wide array of other titles, reinforcing the service’s strategic importance regardless of where individual games are ultimately sold.

VII. Historical Precedents and Future of Exclusivity

The potential licensing of Halo to a Nintendo console is a significant move, but it occurs within a broader historical context of evolving platform strategies and exclusivity norms in the video game industry.

A. Lessons from Past Multi-Platform Shifts

  1. Sega’s Transition to Third-Party Publisher:
    Sega, once a leading console manufacturer, ultimately exited the hardware market after the commercial failures of the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast. These failures were attributed to various factors, including intense competition, misjudged market timing, and insufficient third-party support for the Dreamcast in its later stages.49 Following its exit from hardware in 2001, Sega successfully reinvented itself as a third-party software publisher, bringing its iconic franchises like Sonic the Hedgehog to former rival platforms.49 This transition demonstrates that a company can not only survive but also thrive by focusing on software after ceasing hardware production. However, a key difference is that Sega’s move was largely driven by financial necessity, whereas Microsoft currently possesses substantial financial strength.51 Phil Spencer has acknowledged the comparisons to Sega and the concerns Xbox players have regarding their digital libraries and the future of Xbox hardware, emphasizing Microsoft’s commitment to respecting player investments through features like backward compatibility.52
  2. Sony and Microsoft’s PC Releases:
    Both Sony and Microsoft have increasingly adopted the practice of releasing their former console-exclusive titles on PC. This strategy has generally served to extend the commercial lifespan of these games, reach new audiences, and generate additional revenue, typically without causing catastrophic damage to their respective console businesses.39 This has contributed to a normalization of timed or tiered exclusivity, where games may be exclusive to a console for a certain period before becoming available on PC. Sony’s PC releases, for instance, often maintain a significant window of console exclusivity.39 Microsoft has taken this further with its “Play Anywhere” initiative and, more recently, by bringing titles like Gears of War: Reloaded to PlayStation, complete with cross-play functionality.41 These precedents indicate a gradual erosion of strict, lifelong hardware exclusivity.
  3. Other Notable Examples:
    The history of gaming is replete with strategic uses of exclusivity. Atari’s exclusive home console licenses for arcade hits like Space Invaders and Pac-Man were pivotal in establishing the concept of “killer apps”.53 In a more modern context, when Final Fantasy XIII transitioned from a PlayStation 3 exclusive to a multi-platform release (including Xbox 360), it provoked anger among some fans but ultimately resulted in higher sales for Square Enix.53 Conversely, Microsoft’s costly attempt to secure timed exclusivity for Grand Theft Auto IV downloadable content on the Xbox 360 eventually saw that content released on PlayStation 3 as well, highlighting the complexities and sometimes transient nature of such deals.53 These examples underscore that financial and market reach considerations often supersede platform purity in strategic decision-making.

B. The Evolving Definition of “Exclusivity”

The concept of “exclusivity” in the video game industry is becoming increasingly nuanced. It is no longer a simple binary of a game being available on one platform and not others. Modern interpretations include:

  • Timed Exclusives: Games launching first on one console before arriving on others later.
  • Console Launch Exclusives: Games debuting on a console but also available on PC from day one or shortly thereafter.
  • Service Exclusives: Titles available day one on a subscription service like Xbox Game Pass, making the service the “exclusive” gateway for that initial access period.
  • IP Exclusivity: The game itself might be multi-platform, but the intellectual property remains owned by a platform holder, who dictates its availability.

The overarching trend is towards broader availability of games over time, rather than perpetual hardware lock-ins.30 The gaming console market itself is projected for continued growth, significantly driven by the rise of cloud gaming, which enables access to console-quality experiences across a multitude of devices, further blurring traditional platform boundaries.27 The sheer dominance of mobile gaming, which accounted for approximately 49% of global gaming revenue in 2024 27, also exerts pressure on traditional console business models to adapt and seek wider audiences.

The historical trajectory, from Sega’s strategic pivot to the contemporary practice of PC releases by Sony and Microsoft, reveals a consistent pattern: companies adapt when the financial or strategic advantages of multi-platform releases outweigh the perceived benefits of maintaining strict hardware exclusivity. Microsoft’s potential licensing of Halo to the Nintendo Switch 2 can be seen as a significant escalation of this established trend. This escalation is fueled by the immense scale of Microsoft’s IP portfolio following major acquisitions and the shifting economic realities of game development, publishing, and distribution. The core principle remains the maximization of IP value; as development costs soar and hardware competition remains intense, leveraging extensive IP libraries across all viable, high-volume platforms becomes an increasingly compelling financial strategy.

Consequently, the “future of exclusivity” may lie less in preventing access to games on competing hardware and more in curating preferential access or superior value within a company’s own ecosystem. For example, a game like Halo might be available for purchase on the Switch 2, but Xbox Game Pass subscribers could receive it day one as part of their subscription, play it with enhanced performance on an Xbox Series X or high-end PC, benefit from integrated cloud saves across the Xbox ecosystem, or receive exclusive in-game content or perks. This model allows for revenue generation from sales on other platforms while still providing compelling reasons for consumers to engage deeply with the primary ecosystem (e.g., Xbox and Game Pass). The definition of “exclusive benefit” is thus shifting from “you can only play it here” to “you can play it best, earliest, cheapest, or with more content here.”

Table 4: Notable Console Exclusives That Went Multi-Platform

Game Title / FranchiseOriginal “Exclusive” Platform(s)New Platform(s)Reported Rationale / OutcomeSource(s)
Halo (Master Chief Collection)XboxPotentially PS5, Switch 2Maximize IP revenue, reinvigorate franchise, align with multi-platform strategy13
Gears of War: ReloadedXboxPS5, PCMulti-platform strategy, revenue generation41
Sea of Thieves, Hi-Fi Rush, Pentiment, GroundedXboxPS5, SwitchTest multi-platform waters, revenue generation, expand audience12
MLB The ShowPlayStationXbox, SwitchMandate from MLB for wider reach and increased sales30
Final Fantasy XIIIPS3 (initially announced)Xbox 360Increased sales volume53
Sega Franchises (e.g., Sonic)Sega ConsolesAll major platformsSega’s exit from hardware manufacturing; focus on software publishing49
Various PlayStation Studios Titles (e.g., Horizon Zero Dawn, God of War (2018))PlayStationPCExtend sales, reach new audience, often after a period of console exclusivity39

This table illustrates that the movement of exclusives to other platforms is not a new phenomenon but rather an ongoing feature of the industry, driven by diverse strategic and financial motivations.

VIII. Conclusion: A Calculated Gamble for a New Gaming Era

The decision for Microsoft to license its flagship Halo franchise to the Nintendo Switch 2 is far more than an isolated business tactic; it is a potent symbol and a logical, albeit audacious, extension of the company’s profound strategic pivot towards a software and services-centric model in the gaming sphere. The financial undercurrents—declining Xbox hardware revenue contrasted with the robust growth of content sales and Game Pass subscriptions, coupled with the escalating costs of AAA game development—provide a compelling rationale for maximizing the reach and revenue of its most valuable intellectual properties.1

From a long-term business perspective focused on the overall profitability and enduring strength of its gaming division and IP portfolio, licensing Halo to the Switch 2 appears to be a strategically sound, if not inevitable, step for Microsoft. The potential for substantial new revenue streams from Nintendo’s vast and engaged player base, coupled with the opportunity to introduce Halo to a new generation and broaden its appeal, is significant.1 This is particularly crucial for an IP like Halo, which, while iconic, has faced recent challenges in maintaining its once-unassailable dominance.

However, this strategic advantage comes with the undeniable and significant consequence of further diminishing the traditional value proposition of Xbox hardware and potentially diluting the Xbox brand’s identity as a distinct console ecosystem.4 The risk of alienating a segment of loyal Xbox fans who prioritize exclusivity is real, as is the potential for some cannibalization of Xbox console sales if a primary reason for purchasing the hardware—access to Halo—is removed.

The ultimate success of this gamble hinges on Microsoft’s adeptness in navigating this complex transition. The key will be its ability to ensure that Xbox Game Pass remains an overwhelmingly compelling and distinct value proposition, even as individual first-party titles become available for purchase elsewhere.34 If Game Pass can continue to offer unparalleled value through its extensive library, day-one access to new Microsoft titles, cloud gaming integration, and potentially other ecosystem perks, it can serve as the primary anchor for players within the Xbox sphere, regardless of where they might choose to buy a single game.

Microsoft’s future in gaming is increasingly shaping up to be that of a ubiquitous content provider, akin to a “Netflix for games,” where its own hardware—including potential future handheld devices 1—serves as just one of many access points to its core offerings: Game Pass and its ever-expanding library of owned IP. For Microsoft, the “console wars” are not ending but are rather transforming—from a battle primarily fought over hardware unit sales to a more multifaceted competition for subscription dominance, software sales across all screens, and player engagement within its service ecosystem.

This decision, therefore, is less about Microsoft abandoning the Xbox console and more about a fundamental redefinition of what “Xbox” signifies. It represents a strategic trade-off: relinquishing a degree of hardware exclusivity and the traditional console warrior identity in exchange for the potential to achieve a much larger, more profitable, and arguably more sustainable role as a cross-platform content and service behemoth. The long-term success of this bold strategy will be measured by whether the substantial gains from expanded IP monetization and service growth can effectively outweigh, and ultimately compensate for, the potential decline of its dedicated hardware business and the associated ripple effects throughout its ecosystem. It is a calculated risk, emblematic of a new era in the gaming industry where content accessibility and service value are rapidly becoming the paramount currencies.

Works cited

  1. A Comprehensive Analysis of Xbox Strategy – Gamezawy, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.gamezawy.com/comprehensive-analysis-of-xboxs-strategy/
  2. Microsoft to release previously Xbox-exclusive … – Ampere Analysis, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.ampereanalysis.com/insight/microsoft-to-release-previously-xbox-exclusive-titles-on-rival-consoles
  3. Xbox’s record results for Game Pass and Call of Duty offset by continued decline in hardware revenue, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://gameworldobserver.com/2025/01/30/xbox-record-q2-game-pass-cod-hardware-revenue-decline
  4. “Is this an Xbox?”: How Microsoft turning into multiplatform publisher that has yet to find its identity | Game World Observer, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://gameworldobserver.com/2025/03/28/microsoft-multiplatform-strategy-xbox-identity
  5. GDC 2025: Xbox Cloud Gaming (Beta): Expanding Your Reach, Enhancing Your Game, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/games/articles/2025/03/gdc-2025-xbox-cloud-gaming-beta-expanding-your-reach-enhancing-your-game/
  6. How Xbox lost its fans, and won them back — and more from a new book about Microsoft innovation – GeekWire, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.geekwire.com/2025/how-xbox-lost-its-fans-and-won-them-back-and-more-from-a-new-book-about-microsoft-innovation/
  7. Helping Indie Developers Succeed on Xbox: Strategies for Pre-Launch, Launch, and Beyond – Microsoft Developer, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/games/articles/2025/04/helping-indie-developers-succeed-on-xbox/
  8. This Xbox analysis shows how only 7% of games launched with “Play Anywhere” support last year | Windows Central, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/only-7-percent-of-games-launched-on-xbox-last-year-with-play-anywhere-support-a-decline-year-over-year
  9. Halo franchise (software) | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/sports-and-leisure/halo-franchise-software
  10. Halo is at a crossroads — Can it pull itself back to up? | Windows …, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/halo-franchise-is-at-a-crossroads
  11. Xbox boss talks Switch 2 support, says Nintendo a “great partner” – Reddit, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoBestFriendsPlay/comments/1k0l7ns/xbox_boss_talks_switch_2_support_says_nintendo_a/
  12. Why Microsoft Missing the Switch 2 Direct May Impact June’s Xbox Event – Game Rant, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://gamerant.com/nintendo-switch-2-direct-microsoft-missing-xbox-event-june-reveals-likely/
  13. Halo Finally Looks Set to Make the Jump to PlayStation This Year – IGN, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.ign.com/articles/halo-finally-looks-set-to-make-the-jump-to-playstation-this-year
  14. Halo Coming To Switch 2 And PS5 In 2025 Alongside Gears, Flight Sim, And More – Report, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.gamespot.com/articles/halo-coming-to-switch-2-and-ps5-in-2025-alongside-gears-flight-sim-and-more-report/1100-6528744/
  15. Switch 2 reportedly getting Halo and another big Xbox game, with Microsoft set to be a “very big supporter” – Eurogamer, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.eurogamer.net/switch-2-reportedly-getting-halo-and-another-big-xbox-game-with-microsoft-set-to-be-a-very-big-supporter
  16. Nintendo Switch 2: What you need to know about the sold-out system as June 5 release date nears – Engadget, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.engadget.com/gaming/nintendo/nintendo-switch-2-the-new-system-update-sold-out-pre-orders-and-everything-else-you-need-to-know-143310479.html
  17. Nintendo Switch 2｜Nintendo Official Website, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.nintendo.com/sg/switch2/index.html
  18. Nintendo Switch 2 – All official announcements (hardware, software, features, accessories), accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.installbaseforum.com/forums/threads/nintendo-switch-2-all-official-announcements-hardware-software-features-accessories.3619/
  19. Why the Switch 2 May Benefit from Xbox’s Most Underpowered Console – How-To Geek, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.howtogeek.com/the-switch-2-and-xbox-series-s-might-help-each-other/
  20. Microsoft may announce which first-party Xbox games will arrive on Nintendo Switch 2 soon, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.notebookcheck.net/Microsoft-may-announce-which-first-party-Xbox-games-will-arrive-on-Nintendo-Switch-2-soon.1021376.0.html
  21. Nintendo Addresses Switch 2 Supply for 2025 – Game Rant, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://gamerant.com/nintendo-switch-2-supply-chain-shipments-inventory-forecast/
  22. Nintendo Says Switch 2 Game-Key Cards Help Third-Party Publishers Bring ‘Deeper, Larger, and More Immersive Content on the Platform’ – IGN, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.ign.com/articles/nintendo-says-switch-2-game-key-cards-help-third-party-publishers-bring-deeper-larger-and-more-immersive-content-on-the-platform
  23. Nintendo Switch 2 – Game-Key Cards | Hardware, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.nintendo.com/en-gb/Hardware/Nintendo-Switch-2/Nintendo-Switch-2-Game-Key-Cards-2785635.html
  24. Nintendo Announces That Switch 2 Game-Key Cards Can Be Borrowed and Resold, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://9meters.com/technology/consoles/nintendo-announces-that-switch-2-game-key-cards-can-be-borrowed-and-resold
  25. Nintendo Switch 2’s huge third-party support is something “we haven’t seen” from Nintendo “maybe ever, but at least for a long time, maybe even since the GameCube,” analyst says – Reddit, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/nintendo/comments/1khvwbq/nintendo_switch_2s_huge_thirdparty_support_is/
  26. The Switch’s Growing Third Party Problem – VGChartz, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.vgchartz.com/article/449937/the-switchs-growing-third-party-problem/
  27. Gaming Industry Report 2025: Market Size & Trends – Udonis Blog, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.blog.udonis.co/mobile-marketing/mobile-games/gaming-industry
  28. Xbox increases price of games to match Nintendo Switch 2 – Club386, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.club386.com/xbox-increases-price-of-games-to-match-nintendo-switch-2/
  29. Xbox studios are working on multiple Nintendo Switch 2 ports, claims report – Reddit, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/NintendoSwitch2/comments/1ksna7w/xbox_studios_are_working_on_multiple_nintendo/
  30. My opinion has changed on the multiplatform approach. : r/xbox – Reddit, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/xbox/comments/1i6kx9c/my_opinion_has_changed_on_the_multiplatform/
  31. “Why Should We Even Bother Making An Xbox Game”: Devs And Publishers Are Reportedly “Baffled” By Xbox’s Exclusivity Strategy – TheGamer, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.thegamer.com/xbox-game-devs-publishers-reportedly-baffled-exclusivity-strategy/
  32. Xbox’s multi-platform strategy leaves publishers confused as console support may be ignored | Games – GameGPU, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://en.gamegpu.com/game/Xbox%27s-multiplatform-strategy-causes-confusion-and-console-support-updates-may-start-to-be-ignored
  33. Microsoft Gaming: Phil Spencer responds to Xbox fans who fear a loss of brand identity, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/zocken/comments/1ib5mmb/microsoft_gaming_phil_spencer_reagiert_auf/?tl=en
  34. Five Ways The Switch 2 Reveal Has Been A Huge Win For Xbox, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.purexbox.com/features/five-ways-the-switch-2-reveal-has-been-a-huge-win-for-xbox
  35. Please let it be! : r/Switch – Reddit, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Switch/comments/1ih8jwk/please_let_it_be/
  36. Are people seriously excited for the Switch 2? : r/NintendoSwitch – Reddit, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/NintendoSwitch/comments/1jq5j1w/are_people_seriously_excited_for_the_switch_2/
  37. If The Switch 2 Is Just A Better Switch, I’ll Be A Bit Disappointed – Kotaku, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://kotaku.com/switch-2-joy-con-nintendo-new-features-1851735307
  38. Our Reactions To The Switch 2 Reveal And More Of The Week’s Takes – Kotaku, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://kotaku.com/switch-2-reveal-pokemon-tcg-scalpers-gta-6-1851742245
  39. Does this hint at the end of exclusivity? : r/videogames – Reddit, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/videogames/comments/1ju247n/does_this_hint_at_the_end_of_exclusivity/
  40. A Breakdown of How the Demonization of Console Exclusives Started on February 15, 2024 | IconEra, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://icon-era.com/threads/a-breakdown-of-how-the-demonization-of-console-exclusives-started-on-february-15-2024.15854/
  41. Microsoft is launching beloved Xbox exclusive on PlayStation for the …, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.tomsguide.com/gaming/microsoft-is-launching-beloved-xbox-exclusive-on-playstation-for-the-first-time
  42. Xbox Games Reportedly Coming to the Nintendo Switch 2, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://gamerant.com/xbox-games-nintendo-switch-2-report/
  43. Halo the Final PS5 Holdout of Xbox’s Historic Big Three | Push Square, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.pushsquare.com/news/2025/05/halo-the-final-ps5-holdout-of-xboxs-historic-big-three
  44. Microsoft Raised Xbox Console and Game Prices; Analysts Say PlayStation (and Everyone Else) Could Be Next – IGN, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.ign.com/articles/microsoft-raised-xbox-console-and-game-prices-analysts-say-playstation-and-everyone-else-could-be-next
  45. Nintendo Stock Has a Lot to Prove This Week | The Motley Fool, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.fool.com/investing/2025/04/01/nintendo-stock-has-a-lot-to-prove-this-week/
  46. 3 Reasons Why I Bought More Nintendo Stock in 2025 | Nasdaq, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/3-reasons-why-i-bought-more-nintendo-stock-2025
  47. Is Nintendo (NTDOY.US) about to release the Switch 2, the most popular product in gaming history?, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://news.futunn.com/en/post/54291073/is-nintendo-ntdoyus-about-to-release-the-switch-2-the
  48. Op-Ed: How the Market Will Affect the New Nintendo Switch, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/mje/2025/05/16/op-ed-how-the-market-will-affect-the-new-nintendo-switch/
  49. Why Did Sega Stop Making Consoles? The Reason Why It Failed, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.slashgear.com/1748804/sega-consoles-failed-reason/
  50. The role of autonomy in platform subsidiary governance. The case of Sega Saturn. By Matt Farrell Center for Applied Business Research, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.apsu.edu/business/applied-research/files/white-papers/CABR_White_Paper_Farrell_Sega.pdf
  51. With Xbox declining and Microsoft porting more of their games to the PS5, many gamers feel like history will repeat and Microsoft will eventually become the new Sega. How did you feel when Sega announced they were discontinuing the Dreamcast and going third-party? – Reddit, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/dreamcast/comments/1itzqhj/with_xbox_declining_and_microsoft_porting_more_of/
  52. Xbox Boss on Third-Party Concerns and Sega Comparisons: “I Get It” – GamingBolt, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-boss-on-third-party-concerns-and-sega-comparisons-i-get-it
  53. Platform Exclusive (Concept) – Giant Bomb, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.giantbomb.com/platform-exclusive/3015-5670/
  54. Gaming Console Market Size to Hit USD 65.92 Bn by 2034 – Precedence Research, accessed on May 25, 2025, https://www.precedenceresearch.com/gaming-console-market

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *